![]() Brumbar another heavy also is a good pick. People chosing the panther wich is a heavy or the tiger (s) over them. ![]() P4's ostwinds stugs etc are more often then not skipped or are only build once per game. Just in coh2 heavies are much to prominent esp for axis. But for mp they would be a viable addition. So thematicly i makes sense they dint get them in africa. the Tiger 1 or the Churchill was used at the games time frame of WW2. Would be weird to exclude heavy tanks from a WW2 game, especially because e.g. Maybe it even works, if the DAK has always access to the Tiger 1, because it seems that the get weakier in the mid game, that stalls the time until the Tiger. I don't see any problem with heavies like they were implemented in CoH 2 after the last updates it received. ![]() The game would probably be better without them imo. Just make them very expensive and limit acces them greatly. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |